![maxqda multiple researchers maxqda multiple researchers](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5cb8c711b10f2531b08d6749/1578416068312-H7YOCQNX2IOBJ4QJDGQG/table1.png)
![maxqda multiple researchers maxqda multiple researchers](https://www.maxqda.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/Screenshot-2-2.png)
About the author This blog post was a collective effort by the Independent Evaluation Team, represented by Zeinab Hijazi. Despite challenges faced and the need for ongoing work to improve its success, the network presents as an influential platform to construct and share knowledge around MHPSS. The evaluation validated the importance of the MHPSS Network for the MHPSS sector and MHPSS actors around the globe. In addition, we also found that there is a strong perception by members, hosts and advisory board members alike that the MHPSS Network has yielded positive individual and organizational level outcomes through increased knowledge from resources and connections made available by the network’s online learning platform. Perceptions and experiences shared by members, hosts, and advisory board members, along with suggestions, were analyzed. Overall, positive and negative perceptions around site functions of the MHPSS network emerged as themes. Once all interviews were fully coded, analysis began. Certain sections of texts fell into multiple areas of interest and therefore were given multiple codes. As shown in the photo below, areas of interest were color coded into groups for ease of identification.
MAXQDA MULTIPLE RESEARCHERS CODE
The improved code system formed the basis for a more structured coding process. Both of them worked on different project files, and at the end, the two projects were merged together. Code definitions were refined further, as a result, and new codes were added where necessary.Īfter this point, the two researchers divided up the rest of the interviews’ coding amongst them.
MAXQDA MULTIPLE RESEARCHERS HOW TO
Based on these results, the researchers discussed their individual coding styles and decided how to ameliorate differences. It was realized that some codes were underutilized, while other codes’ meaning was understood differently. While ‘code existence’ provided an overview of comparison between the two researchers’ coding, the ‘segment agreement’ was used to do an in-depth review of the coding.
![maxqda multiple researchers maxqda multiple researchers](https://www.maxqda.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/Lemmatized-word-frequency-MAXQDA1.png)
When utilizing the inter-coder agreement, the code existence and segment agreement were calculated. The researchers were allowed to discuss the coding process while coding these interviews, to clarify any confusions or misunderstandings. Next, two researchers coded the same five interviews and utilized the inter-coder agreement function on these interviews. The codes fell into areas of interest such as “purpose of ” or “site functions most useful.” Code definitions were created for each code, using the code memo feature. First, a unified list of codes was developed based on research questions and the themes that were arising from the initial review of interviews. Two researchers were specifically dedicated to coding, under the supervision of a third researcher. Using “Intercoder Agreement” to Improve the Code SystemĪfter completing transcription of the interviews, the research team began the coding process. Der Blogbeitrag geht auf die Nutzung der „Intercoder Agreement“-Funktion von MAXQDA 12 ein und beschreibt, wie sie die Arbeit des Teams bereichert hat. Diese erfolgt mit der Unterstützung von weiteren vier Research Associates. Das Team des Evaluation Project hat seine Arbeit mit MAXQDA fortgesetzt ( hier finden Sie den ersten Blogbeitrag des Teams) und zwei unabhängig Forschende mit der Evaluation beauftragt.